Which is better krakow or warsaw

In an ideal world, you would be able to visit both Warsaw and Krakow. People often ask which is better, Warsaw or Krakow?

Well, both cities are famed for their medieval town squares, rich history, and a wealth of restaurants and bars. Most who have already travelled to Poland have a clear favourite out of the two. But for travellers who have never been, how can they which is better: Warsaw or Krakow? If you are flying to Poland, check Jetradar. And for those willing to book tours in the country, check GetYourGuide. There are festivals every year for dance, music, theatre, and food — and many more things too.

Warsaw was almost destroyed in World War 2. However, it still retains a range of architecture which includes gothic, baroque, and neoclassical. Both cities have excellent offerings when it comes to nightlife. Warsaw has something for everyone and offers a greater variation than Krakow. One urban myth claims there are more bars per square metre than any other town in Europe. So, as long as you can avoid the British stag and hen-dos, Krakow wins our vote on nightlife! Nearby, there are plenty of great day trips near Krakow.

You can hike the Tatras. Krakow is the city of Polish kings and queens Krakow was actually the capital of Poland until as late as , which means it reigned over the nation during its glorious golden age. Krakow is easier to navigate. Archaeological site, Cemetery, Church.

Copy link. Map View. They are awash with mystical carvings from centuries gone by, and even host a complete underground cathedral carved from sodium rock!

More info. Open In Google Maps. Visit Website. Visit Facebook page. Give us feedback. It also has more crowds, though I'm not sure what it would be like in December. I had 4 nights there in April , and it was plenty. I had a lot of free time to explore and relax. I went to Auschwitz but not to the Wieliczka Salt Mine..

That's a lot but if it's cold, you might appreciate being able to spend time in cafes to warm up between wandering the streets. Warsaw is a bigger city and has many interesting sights. I had 3 nights there, and I really liked it.

But it's also further from VIenna. I think if you have 5 nights, you'll be rushed doing both Warsaw and Krakow, so I'd stick with Krakow. I'd also opt for just Krakow, if making a short escapade to Poland. I was in Krakow during Christmas time 2 years ago and they had a wonderful Christmas market in the Rynek Glowny largest medieval town square in Europe , complete with many colourful handmade crafts and food stalls serving Pierogi and Polish sausages.

I agree with the other posters about just going to Krakow for that limited amount of time - save Warsaw for another trip.

There is lots to see in Krakow and the surrounding area we also liked the Schindler museum, besides the side trips to Auschwitz and the salt mine , and you will want to spend some time just wandering the city and really enjoying the ambiance. I would skip Warsaw as everyone else suggests and focus on Krakow, Auschwitz and Vienna. I visited the salt mines in Krakow and don't recommend it unless you get up early on a Sunday morning for a church service since the chapel was the only highlight for me.

I was in both Krakow and Vienna late Nov early Dec and found it to be extremely cold, so do invest in a very warm coat, hat, scarf, good walking boots and anti-blister socks. I would also buy hand and feet warmers. I agree that you should spend all your Poland time in Krakow.